| |

In This Issue
Helpful Links
Contact Us
The Contextual Leadership Initiative staff
is here to support you!
Contact us with your concerns or suggestions. Previous
Newsletters
Want to re-read an article from a previous
issue? Review previous
newsletters. |
| |
|
Internship
Newsletter: April 2008
The Final Paragraph 
Congratulations!
You've made it to the end of internship! (Well, almost...) As the
last few weeks or months of internship approach, all of you interns,
supervisors and lay committee members will turn your attention to
the final - and most important - evaluation.
Similar to the other evaluations, the final internship evaluation
is used to assess an intern's growth and development over the course
of the internship year; it follows the same format as the six-month
form, with one additional section: the summary recommendation.
This extra section becomes a vital part of the student's approval
and assignment process. The summary paragraph contains valuable
information about the student's internship experience - including
unique gifts for the ministry and growth areas for the future
discovered on internship - that will be shared with the bishops when
students are assigned. The recommendations made in this section also
have the potential to affect a student's approval process.
The summary recommendation section is at the beginning of the
final evaluation but is best filled in after the remainder of the
evaluation is complete. It is divided into two parts: recommendation
to the seminary and summary paragraph.
The recommendation to the seminary has three ranks,
"unconditional," "conditional" and "not recommended." A
"conditional" or "not recommended" notation should include the
reasons for the ranking. Such a ranking typically should not come as
a surprise to the intern, but should be based on unresolved issues
or concerns raised in previous evaluations and discussed with the
intern. The student's seminary would follow up on either of these
ranks.
The summary paragraph section allows for 500 characters
(including spaces and punctuation) to describe/recommend the student
for ordained ministry. It should give a thumbnail sketch of the
student's gifts, strengths and growing edges.
While general glowing recommendations can be nice for the
student's confidence, they are not very useful for bishops or others
whose only knowledge about the candidate's internship may be what is
written in these brief statements. They're glad that you loved Vicar
Jane, but they need to know why. Give specific examples of what she
excelled at and loved to do, what she struggled with and needs to
work on, what types of ministry settings might best work for her
when she is ordained.
Space is limited, however, so brevity is required.
Consider the following examples as good models:
- "We highly recommend Janet for pastoral ministry. Her
sermons are excellent, and her speaking style is clear. She
relates well with congregation members of all ages and has good
listening skills and the discipline necessary to multi-task."
- "John is a person of deep faith and clear call. He has
great skills in listening and being present with people. His
preaching has become more engaging and gospel centered. He works
well on a team. He needs more training and experience with
stewardship and evangelism."
- "Internship provided me with a great deal of opportunity to
develop my pastoral presence through visitation, weekly worship
leadership, regular preaching, and teaching numerous adult and
confirmation classes. I found teaching to be a core element of my
sense of call which I plan to make a central part of my future
ministry."
If you're still struggling with what to write, try asking
yourself the following questions:
What would you want a congregation to know about this person if
they were considering calling him as their pastor? What could they
expect from him?
What would a bishop need to know about this person in order to
decide whether or not he has any congregations that might be good
matches for her first call? What distinguishes her from the rest of
the candidates out there? Would she prefer to work and/or excel as a
member of a pastoral team or as a solo pastor (or could she adapt
well to either setting)?
All three summary paragraphs - the student's, the supervisor's
and the lay committee's - are put on the Form D, which becomes a
part of the student's package that is sent to ELCA bishops as part
of the assignment process. The Form D also contains summary
recommendations from the faculty at the student's seminary and
her/his candidacy committee, but only you can speak directly about
student's internship work.
On Competitive Cooking 
By Steve McKinley
Now
and then I curl up in my recliner and spend some time with the Food
Network. It's something like looking at the latest Ferrari
catalogue. I carry plenty of pork on my frame, no doubt about that,
but I wouldn't dare eat Paula Dean's deep-fried dandies or the kind
of high-fat grub that shows up on "Diners, Drive-Ins and Dives." It
is fun to look at just the same.
Spending time with the Food Network has exposed me to this new
concept that is serious competitive cooking. Oh, I knew about state
fairs and the Pillsbury Bake-off and that kind of thing, and now and
then dropped in on a church supper where Mrs. Anderson was out to
show that her potato salad was much tastier than Mrs. Johnson's, but
now I have discovered Iron Chefs and Throw-Downs and all that. I
make a pretty good pot of baked beans if I do say so myself, but I
say it softly lest Bobby Flay show up in my kitchen and challenge me
to a throw-down. This is serious stuff with significant prizes and
maybe a spot on the menu at TGI Friday's at stake.
Entertaining, but I do not love competitive cooking. I prefer the
kind of cooking that has the whole family elbowing each other in the
kitchen trying to get everything just right, or the smell of my
wife's cinnamon rolls, or our daughter whipping up Shepherd's Pie
for the whole family, or our son's special paella. One of my wife's
friends was in charge of the soup supper at her church one week
during Lent, and was headed to church early in the morning because
this would be home-made chicken noodle soup, and she had to get to
church early to make the noodles! That's what cooking is about,
friends: food that nourishes and gives joy. Forget the competition.
I feel the same way about mission. Every now and then a person
runs across a church that is competitive, which makes about as much
sense to me as competitive cooking. First Lutheran Church is
determined to have the "best youth ministry in town." Word has it
that the folks at Trinity Lutheran have upgraded their youth
ministry, so the gang at First has to do even better, so that they
can still say they have the "best youth ministry in town." And so
with choirs, organists, lutefisk suppers, etc. Which is not even to
touch on the topic of the competition between the First Lutherans
and the First Baptists.
(A digression - but then again maybe not: A few years ago the
local church softball league was holding its season-ending playoffs.
The league had two divisions and the divisions played off against
each other. Finally came the championship game, which we hung around
to watch even though we weren't playing in it. The championship game
never finished because it degenerated into a brawl between the two
teams. They were both from the same church. I couldn't make this
stuff up.)
As I was saying before I so rudely interrupted myself: churches
competing with each other to see who can have the biggest and best
whatever? Who can have the biggest attendance or the most new
members? Please. We can do better than this.
Quite a few years ago a noted mission planter reminded one of his
congregations that "...we are not fighting against principalities
and powers, but against the world rulers of this present darkness."
First Lutheran's competition isn't Trinity Lutheran or First Baptist
or St. Joseph Roman Catholic. Rather First Lutheran and Trinity
Lutheran and First Baptist and St. Joseph Roman Catholic are all
together trying to reach people with the incredible good news of
what God is up to through Jesus Christ in our world today, to live
out God's love in the world, and to invite people to get with the
movement. Mission is not something we do in competition with other
Christians; it is something we do in partnership with them and when
we make it competitive, we only weaken its overall impact.
The best mission is no more competitive than the best cooking is.
Intern Financial Stewardship Sermon
Contest 
We
are getting close to the deadline for the Intern Financial
Stewardship Contest for those on internship in 2007-2008. It is
designed to enrich and strengthen the practice of stewardship in the
church by advocating preaching and teaching that promotes the
stewardship of financial resources. The prize is made possible by a
grant from the Arthur Larson Stewardship Education Fund and is
sponsored by the Center for Stewardship Leadership.
All interns who submit a sermon on financial stewardship as
prepared and presented during the year of internship will be given a
$50 bookstore voucher, either for the Luther Seminary Bookstore or
the GTU Bookstore. In addition, all sermons will be presented to a
committee which will select the prize winners. First place will earn
$500, second place $250, and 3rd, 4th, and 5th place will earn $150.
In addition the first prize winner will be asked to preach the
sermon in chapel during his or her senior year.
The sermons will be judged on the following criteria:
- Relevance to today's North American Christians.
- Biblical, theological and homiletical standards.
- Focus on financial stewardship that is reflected in gratitude,
responsibility, generosity and willingness to give back with
increase.
- Call for people to change the way they live in the world of
everyday life.
Insofar as almost every text provides an opportunity to be a
"stewardship sermon," you are encouraged to give your financial
stewardship sermon during a time of year that has no connection with
the annual effort to gather money for the congregation.
Sermons should be sent to:
Jerry Hoffman, Director
Center for Stewardship Leadership
2481 Como Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55108
e-mail:
jhoffman@luthersem.edu
Please include a paragraph describing the congregational context
for the sermon. You may submit your sermons on a CD or as a written
text. If you used PowerPoint and/or video, you may include those as
well. Please footnote and properly document all your sources.
All submitted sermons become property of the Center and may be
reprinted in seminary publications and at the Stewardship for the
21th Century Web site without compensation to the author but with
recognition.
The deadline for submitting a sermon will be June 1, 2008.
Spring Cluster Meetings 
-
Northern TC Metro Cluster - April 3, 2-8
p.m., with option of overnight at Episcopal House of Prayer,
Collegeville, Minn. (Laure Schwartz)
-
Wisconsin Cluster - April 8, 1 p.m. to
April 9, 3 p.m., at St. Bede Retreat Center, Eau Claire, Wis.
(Gary Wilkerson)
-
East TC Metro Cluster - April 10, 10 a.m. -
4 p.m., at Carondelet Center, St. Paul, Minn. (Laure Schwartz)
-
Oregon-SW Washington Cluster - April 24-25,
Menucha Retreat Center, Corbett, Ore. (Julie Josund)
-
Southern California Cluster - April 29-30,
Mary and Joseph Retreat Center, Rancho Palos Verdes, Calif.
(Sherwood Glover)
-
Washington Cluster - April 29-30, at
Palisades Retreat Center, Federal Way, Wash. (Julie Josund)
-
Southern Minnesota-SE South Dakota Cluster
- May 1, Shalom Hill Farm, Windom, Minn. (Steve McKinley)
-
Northern California Cluster - May 6-7, San
Damiano Retreat Center, Danville, Calif. (Sherwood Glover)
-
South & West TC Metro Cluster - May 8,
Christ Church Lutheran, Minneapolis, Minn. (Steve McKinley)
-
Denver Cluster - May 13, Our Savior's
Lutheran, Greeley, Col. (Sherwood Glover)
-
Arizona Cluster - June 3, Community
Lutheran, Las Vegas, Nev. (Sherwood Glover)
 |