Media and reality exercise

Course home page / Mary Hess home page / Mary Hess email / Luther Seminary / Fisher's Net
These are the web instructions that accompany an exercise to be done as part of small group learning in CE1515.

Materials needed

One copy of the cd-rom I mailed out to you. We have included a free installer for Quicktime, which is the media player best suited for viewing these clips. Macintoshes come with Quicktime automatically, but not all Windows machines do. You should install Quicktime and make sure the cd-rom works before starting the exercise with your small group.

A computer equipped with audio output and a cd-rom drive.

Enough copies of this handout for each person to have one.

A blackboard, whiteboard, or newsprint sheets large enough for you to write on so that other people can see.

Markers that are fresh enough to use, to write on the board with.


Who should participate?

This exercise works best with at least five people participating (and I've done it with up to 50), but I realize that that may be unrealistic for you to accomplish at short notice. Try to find at least two people, in addition to yourself, who can do this exercise with you.

This is an exercise geared towards late adolescents and beyond. I have never tried it with kids younger than 13, although I suppose you could do that if you'd like to experiment. There is nothing in the video clips that would be likely to be problematic for younger children, but I'm not sure that they would find the exercise all that interesting. Feel free to invite friends, family members, and so on to be a part of the process.



How to do it

Start by explaining to people that this is meant to be an exploration, a fun exercise, and that there are no "right" answers. You might mention that it is also a chance for you to explore a kind of pedagogy as part of a class you're currently taking. The whole experience will likely take about an hour to accomplish.

Next, give people copies of the handout and explain that it is a spectrum line upon which you will ask them to write where they would place each of the short video clips you will show them. Each of the video clips is under three minutes in length, and each has been taken from some popular form of television.

Next, draw a similar line on the board and explain that before showing each clip, you will invite someone to volunteer. Once you've shown the clip, that volunteer will mark on the group board where they would place the clip.

At this point someone will likely want to know what is at the opposite end of the spectrum. Point out that that is something they'll have to think about as they do this exercise. They can decide what to put there.

Find a volunteer, and then show the clip labelled "one.mpg" by inserting the cd-rom into your computer and double-clicking on the title of the clip.

When the clip is finished, allow everyone time to mark their spectrum, and then invite the volunteer to mark it on the board. You can also ask them if they would like to offer any comments as to why they placed it there (but also note that this is not necessary). As the exercise gets going, tell people that they don't need to place their marks in relation to where other people placed theirs, but instead should mark the spectrum as they did on their own handout.

Follow this procedure for each of the clips.


Processing the exercise

When you've shown all of the clips, try to process the experience with people in at least the following ways (I'm sure that more ideas will occur to you, but do at least these). This tends to work best if you use a brainstorming kind of process, where you ask questions and people give you ideas to place on the board.

(1) Ask what criteria they found emerging for their placement as they did it (some examples: the genre of the clip, whether it felt authentic or manipulative, their own personal or previous experience with something similar production values, content, etc.)

(2) Ask them what word they would put at the opposite end of the spectrum (some examples: unreal, surreal, hyperreal, fake, fantasy, false, etc.)

(3) Push people to clarify what "real" might mean for them in this context; in what ways is "true" part of "real"? in what ways is biblical content a category, or not? etc.

Keep track of the questions you engage and the ideas people come up with, and be sure to thank them for their participation.

 




 

3 May 2002