To Know As We Are Known

Readings page / Course home page / Mary Hess home page / Mary Hess email / Luther Seminary / Fisher's Net
Written by Parker Palmer. Published by HarperSanFrancisco, 1993.

 

Ideas

There are many, many ideas in this book. Some of the most complex are embedded in Palmer's definitions. Click here for a handout that lifts up some of the definitions I think you ought to struggle with. Do you agree with his characterization? Do you find it lacking? What do you think?

Many people, when they first read this book, think that he is arguing for something like "everything is relative." I think, however, that he is making a deeper argument about the utter relationality of our knowing. What do you think?


Feelings

Often reading this book will elicit strong memories from people, stories of times when their learning hurt them deeply or when it liberated and empowered them. Do you have any stories that came to mind as you were reading the book? What does the memory, the story, tell you about your own learning and the way it has been shaped and/or you have shaped it?


Action

Parker Palmer has written many wonderful books, but one in particular that I would commend to you is The Courage to Teach. I used some illustrations from that book to accompany my lecture this week, but I would also point to his description of the "grace of great things" found in that book, and particularly his description of ways to shape environments that practice this kind of relational approach to knowing. In particularly he has identified six ways of doing this. I've put his quote on a handout (click here) that you might consider putting within meditation reach this week. (I have one on my desk.)

Meditating on some ways to implement these ideas is just one, very small, form of action. What does this book move you to do? (if anything)




 

12 April 2002